Role of Amine and/or Tin‐Containing Dentifrices on Tooth Discoloration and Surface Properties

article
Autores

Maia, Mariana Beraldo

Tawil, Tammy

Vardasca, Isabela Souza

De Lima, Leonardo Custódio

Bezerra, Savio José Cardoso

Aranha, Ana Cecília Correa

Scaramucci, Taís

Data de Publicação

13 de fevereiro de 2025

Resumo

ABSTRACT Objective This study evaluated the impact of dentifrices containing amine fluoride (AmF) and/or tin on tooth discoloration and surface roughness under cycles of staining and abrasion. Materials and Methods Specimens of enamel ( n = 10) and dentin ( n = 19) were allocated into six groups: (1) Negative control (Distilled water), (2) NaF (regular fluoridated dentifrice without amine and tin), (3) AmF, (4) AmF/NaF/SnCl 2 , (5) SnF 2 /SnCl 2 , and (6) SnF 2 . Daily staining‐toothbrushing cycling was performed: staining solution (30 min), toothbrushing (45 strokes), and human saliva (1 h), 2×/day, for 21 days. Tooth color change (Δ E , Δ L , Δ a , and Δ b ) was determined using a spectrophotometer (CIEDE2000), while surface roughness (ΔRa) was measured with an optical profilometer, and the data were statistically analyzed ( α = 0.05). Results For enamel, no significant differences in Δ E were observed among groups; however, for dentin, AmF exhibited the highest Δ E value, differing from all groups except Negative control ( p textgreater 0.05). Both substrates showed a decrease in luminosity (−Δ L ), with significant differences in dentin for the AmF group ( p textless 0.05). For dentin, all groups showed an increase in tooth yellowness (+Δ b ); while for enamel, only the tin‐containing groups showed this effect. All groups showed an increase in surface roughness after cycling. Enamel Ra showed significant differences post‐treatment, with AmF differing from NaF/AmF/SnCl 2 ( p = 0.012) and control ( p = 0.042). Correlations between ΔRa and Δ E were weak in both substrates ( ρ = 0.12 for enamel; ρ = 0.22 for dentin). Conclusions Brushing with AmF/NaF/SnCl 2 , SnF 2 /SnCl 2 , and SnF 2 ‐containing toothpastes promoted a yellowing of enamel. Brushing with AmF resulted in the greatest darkening of dentin compared with other fluoride salts. Clinical Significance Some components in dentifrices can induce tooth discoloration, which seems to impact dental aesthetics; therefore, clinicians should advise patients on potential color alterations when choosing specific dentifrice products.

Citação

BibTeX
@online{mariana_beraldo2025,
  author = {Mariana Beraldo , Maia and Tammy , Tawil and Isabela Souza ,
    Vardasca and Lima, Leonardo Custódio, De and Savio José Cardoso ,
    Bezerra and Ana Cecília Correa , Aranha and Taís , Scaramucci},
  title = {Role of Amine and/or Tin‐Containing Dentifrices on Tooth
    Discoloration and Surface Properties},
  date = {2025-02-13},
  doi = {10.1111/jerd.13439},
  langid = {pt-BR},
  abstract = {ABSTRACT Objective This study evaluated the impact of
    dentifrices containing amine fluoride (AmF) and/or tin on tooth
    discoloration and surface roughness under cycles of staining and
    abrasion. Materials and Methods Specimens of enamel ( n = 10) and
    dentin ( n = 19) were allocated into six groups: (1) Negative
    control (Distilled water), (2) NaF (regular fluoridated dentifrice
    without amine and tin), (3) AmF, (4) AmF/NaF/SnCl 2 , (5) SnF 2
    /SnCl 2 , and (6) SnF 2 . Daily staining‐toothbrushing cycling was
    performed: staining solution (30 min), toothbrushing (45 strokes),
    and human saliva (1 h), 2×/day, for 21 days. Tooth color change (Δ E
    , Δ L , Δ a , and Δ b ) was determined using a spectrophotometer
    (CIEDE2000), while surface roughness (ΔRa) was measured with an
    optical profilometer, and the data were statistically analyzed ( α =
    0.05). Results For enamel, no significant differences in Δ E were
    observed among groups; however, for dentin, AmF exhibited the
    highest Δ E value, differing from all groups except Negative control
    ( p textgreater 0.05). Both substrates showed a decrease in
    luminosity (−Δ L ), with significant differences in dentin for the
    AmF group ( p textless 0.05). For dentin, all groups showed an
    increase in tooth yellowness (+Δ b ); while for enamel, only the
    tin‐containing groups showed this effect. All groups showed an
    increase in surface roughness after cycling. Enamel Ra showed
    significant differences post‐treatment, with AmF differing from
    NaF/AmF/SnCl 2 ( p = 0.012) and control ( p = 0.042). Correlations
    between ΔRa and Δ E were weak in both substrates ( ρ = 0.12 for
    enamel; ρ = 0.22 for dentin). Conclusions Brushing with AmF/NaF/SnCl
    2 , SnF 2 /SnCl 2 , and SnF 2 ‐containing toothpastes promoted a
    yellowing of enamel. Brushing with AmF resulted in the greatest
    darkening of dentin compared with other fluoride salts. Clinical
    Significance Some components in dentifrices can induce tooth
    discoloration, which seems to impact dental aesthetics; therefore,
    clinicians should advise patients on potential color alterations
    when choosing specific dentifrice products.}
}
Por favor, cite este trabalho como:
Mariana Beraldo, Maia, Tawil Tammy, Vardasca Isabela Souza, De Lima, Leonardo Custódio, Bezerra Savio José Cardoso, Aranha Ana Cecília Correa, and Scaramucci Taís. 2025. “Role of Amine and/or Tin‐Containing Dentifrices on Tooth Discoloration and Surface Properties.” Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. February 13, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13439.